February 25, 2004

The Birds (1963, Alfred Hitchcock) 60

(first viewing in about 12 years.)

Not a whole lot to say about this classic, except that I'm shocked, shocked to realize I never noticed the obvious and profound influence it had on Night of the Living Dead, on both a macro and micro level. As a zombie movie aficionado, I'm quite embarrassed. And it's not like it's subtle, either: Look, there's the dead body in the empty farmhouse; there's the radio report from the outside world; now there's the heroine, mute and slightly crazed by the attacks, gripping the mantel as if to hold on to reality; and there's the yokel, whose philosophy is "just shoot 'em all". I feel like the last to know and the first to cry.

And of course, there's the hero boarding up the house from an unnatural attack, the staple image that nearly every zombie movie is built upon. (It's become such a cliché, that when a lesser zombie movie like Resident Evil comes along, I have to give it some credit when it avoids using it.) It's an image of apocolypse, seen from a peculiarly specific vantage point, which is probably why Hitch ditched the original ending, a drive through a devastated Bodega Bay. (The devastation on the characters' faces is enough.) For me, this image, almost an archetype, of the Boarded-Up House is one of the great inventions of the cinema, and it sure as heck looks like The Birds was there first. (I would've thought it was The Last Man On Earth, the first "I Am Legend" movie, but that came out a year later.)

While The Birds is no doubt an historically important movie, let's face it: it's a bit slow. I understand the reasons behind the careful buildup, but unfortunately, these characters aren't really worth the effort. The Tippi Hedren--Rod Taylor--Jessica Tandy conflict is a real yawner, especially since Hedren's character is a bit vague. What happens is that a drama slowly morphs into a horror film, yet there are no strong links binding the two genres to each other. (Unlike, say, Cat People, which is both a horror movie about lycanthropes and a drama about a disintegrating marriage, but it's impossible to separate one from the other.) While there does seem to be a connection between the repressed feelings of the characters and the bird attacks, it remains in the airy realm of symbolism, never touching down onto concrete reality.

Where we saw it: dvd | We deign to rate it: outta 100
Posted by kza at 10:15 AM | Comments (5)
Comments

I need to rent this, it's one of the HItchcock's that I've never seen. Do you know if Cat People is out on DVD yet? I couldn't find it on Netflix.

Posted by: Martin at February 25, 2004 01:34 PM

Sadly, no Val Lewton flicks are on DVD. My hope, my dream, my fantasy is that Criterion is secretly working on them, and will unveil a Lewton Box Set in the future. But since Citizen Kane, probably the most famous RKO picture, was released by Warner, that's who probably will release it (assuming they ever do).

Posted by: Kza at February 25, 2004 01:44 PM

"The Birds" is another one of those films that, for me, escapes through the "Suspiria"/"Pet Semetary" loophole -- it's severely flawed but also severely effective anyway.

Posted by: Steve at February 26, 2004 10:59 AM

Color me unimpressed with this supposed masterpiece of the cinema. Maybe Hitch's compositions would have won me over on the big screen, but I was bored to death watching this thing on my television and the acting was just dreadful.

Posted by: Scott at February 27, 2004 06:48 PM

I shoulda said something earlier, but I was hoping Martin or Steve would notice the Pernice Bros. quote. Ah, well.

Posted by: Kza at March 5, 2004 03:40 PM