June 05, 2004

the week in review (5/30/04 - 6/5/04)

Not much going on this week, with the move into Ballard, the finicky Internet connection, and the illness that knocked me on my ass for two days. It was like Helm's Deep in my body, I swear.

Stagecoach (1939, John Ford) (v) 93
The Cowboys of Altamira.

Buffalo Bill and the Indians, or Sitting Bull's History Lesson (1976, Robert Altman) (v) 89
After reading some of the reviews on the 'net (especially Dave Kehr's something-crawled-up-my-ass-and-died capsule), I feel like I have to defend my rating. Screw it. This is classic Altman, and if you don't like, go home.

Spring, Summer, Autumn, Winter... and Spring (2004, Kim Ki-Duk) (f) 86
So, raise your hand if you're of the philosophy that says whatever's on the screen is the title. Every review I've seen calls it "Fall" instead of "Autumn"; did I see a British print or something?

Anyway, for a movie about a Buddhist monk and his pupil with that kind of title, you can pretty much predict what's going to happen. (You should be able to guess what happens in the second "Spring" segment right now, without even seeing the film.) What makes it wonderful is that while the end is predictable, the journey there is full of surprises. Ever see a man tow a boat with a rooster? You will.

Secret Fest #2 (can't say, won't say) (f) 47
Additional comments: While I was pretty lukewarm on the movie as a whole, there's an actor in a supporting role who is absolutely fantastic. You may or may not have seen him before; he's got some movies under his belt, but he used to work in a different artform. But I'm telling you now: in 2005, when he's the one of the leads in a major summer blockbuster, he's going to be huge. You heard it here first. Well, you would've, if I told you his name.

They Drive By Night (1940, Raoul Walsh) (v) 16
In what universe was George Raft a star? Oh right, this one. Incredible that this actor, with his oddly-shaped body, weirdly femme-y eyes, and the inability to convey any kind of emotion could be considered a romantic lead, but here's this movie. While there's some promising stuff here about the lives of truckers and the problems of capitalism, it's all torpedoed by incredibly annoying characters (Roscoe Karns makes Red Skelton look like one of Bresson's models), terrible writing (I don't know which is worse, the dinner scene with the one-armed Humphrey Bogart or Ida Lupino's breakdown in the courtroom), dialogue that makes everyone sound like Bugs Bunny (no one has a straight line), and a dopey third act (where people are put on trial for murder without a shred of physical evidence). Bogart manages to come away unscathed, but barely.

Where we saw it: week in review | We deign to rate it: outta 100
Posted by kza at 10:37 AM | Comments (6)
Comments

As annoying as it is that I'm going to agree with Kent and not name the actor in the film that cannot be named but which I saw--I totally agree with the assessment that this guy is gonna be (or should be) huge. He's really amazing. Improbable towels all around.

Posted by: Martin at June 5, 2004 11:59 AM

Wow, look at you doing a Matt Lotti on the classic...I have a feeling that Spring, Summer... is never going to make its way down here. Have to save space for the Macaulay Culkin movie!

Posted by: Scott at June 5, 2004 12:07 PM

Scanning the reviews of BUFFALO BILL and THEY DRIVE, I'm astounded at the whipping the former got and the free pass the latter recieved. They're nowhere *near* each other in quality.

Sorry to hear about THE FIVE SEASONS not making it. It should be okay, generally speaking, on video (going back to *that* conversation)...my only concern is that it's kind of slow and quiet, and I'm not sure how well that translates to home video. (Probably well for some people, not so much for others.)

I'm saving SAVED for video. Sorry they stuck you with that one, man.

Posted by: Kza at June 5, 2004 02:32 PM

I still have hope that Spring, Summer... will show up at some. In the meantime I'll probably go see Harry Potter, if only because I think A Little Princess is the best children's movie of the last twenty years.

Posted by: Scott at June 5, 2004 08:22 PM

What exactly is great about "Sitting Bull"? It has exactly one (1) thing to say, which it does properly in the first half-hour. Which leaves another hour-and-a-half for Altman to beat the film (and Buffalo Bill) into the ground. Did I miss something?

Posted by: Steve at June 5, 2004 09:10 PM

Mark Ruffalo?

Posted by: Scott at June 8, 2004 03:25 PM