Curiously lifeless. Kudos to Liman for finding a way of directing an action flick (like The Bourne Identity) that doesn't feel like it's from the Bruckheimer mold -- something he does with quiet moments and little details sets it apart from the others. But I knew it wasn't working during the dinner scene that leads to the big Pitt/Jolie fight (where they know the other is an enemy agent but aren't sure if the other knows they know... anyway) because a) we're sympathetic (as much as we can be, see the next point) towards both of these characters, and we know it's all going to work out anyway, so the tension is seriously muted; and b) there isn't much to these characters to really care about to begin with. I'm sure this script read well -- one can enjoy, intellectually, how the action tropes are used as metaphors for the couple's marriage -- but on the screen it's pretty empty and joyless, especially as the Smiths' marriage begins to gain meaning and joie de vivre. Doesn't help that Pitt, for me, still reads as a little boy and not an adult, making the relationship difficult to buy in the first place.
Where we saw it: film | We deign to rate it: 58 outta 100Great to see you back! And good call on the film. I couldn't understand half of what Pitt was saying, because he can't properly pronounce his words yet.
Before you mentioned it, I had no idea the guy who directed 'Swingers' directed this.
Posted by: Quack Corleone at September 12, 2005 09:43 AMThanks, man! Hopefully, there'll be more of me to go around pretty soon.
Um, er, or something like that.
Posted by: Kza at September 15, 2005 09:29 PM